Ferry officer jailed over Jersey fatal fishing boat crash

The prosecution highlighted what they called a catalogue of failings by Carr which proved fatal.

Crown Advocate Matthew Maletroit said: “Mr Carr failed to manage and communicate properly with the look out, Arthur Sevash Zade, about the collision danger.”

Artur Sevash-Zade, 35, was found not guilty of gross negligence manslaughter and the jury could not reach a verdict on the shipping law charge.

The court heard how five minutes into Mr Sevash-Zade’s shift, Carr asked him if wanted to go and have breakfast.

This meant Carr was on the look out bridge alone, which went against industry standards.

Mr Maletroit said: “While it was not a cause of the collision, it demonstrates safety was not Mr Carr’s paramount consideration… he was willing to take risks for convenience and saving time.”

Another key area of focus for the prosecution was that Carr did not properly use the technology available to him.

“If Mr Carr made proper use of radar functions he wouldn’t have made error of judgement that L’Ecume II would pass the ship,” Mr Maletroit added.

The prosecution also spoke about how Carr was distracted by non-urgent tasks when radar warning of a potential collision with L’Ecume II were flashing up on screen.

Mr Maletroit said: “Mr Carr should have addressed collision risks before doing other duties.”

The Crown prosecution called for Carr to be sentenced to 23 months in prison for discharging his duty in a manner likely to cause “death, destruction or injury.”

Defence advocate Simon Thomas argued the sentence would be too harsh.

Mr Thomas said, according to international regulations, “there was some responsibility on the crew of L’Ecume II to move their vessel out of the way of the Commodore Goodwill”.

He added Carr trying to alter course before the collision showed it was not a case of his client “simply doing nothing to prevent the collision”.